I took Nov 20th off from work in anticipation :roll: :roll: :roll:
IMO, poor ad campaign.
IMO, poor ad campaign.
John_Madison CT":2uonbmia said:I took Nov 20th off from work in anticipation :roll: :roll: :roll:
IMO, poor ad campaign.
FishFactory":2ux2l1gv said:IMO, Yamaha's overwhelming success has been on the back of relibility, quiet, economical.
FishFactory":1dhu7hwl said:IMO, Yamaha's overwhelming success has been on the back of relibility, quiet, economical.
Up 'he'yar, I'm seeing more and more Suzi 250s than Yam 250s for the #1 reason - POWER. That Yam 250 ain't a 250hp is you don't run HIGH OCTANE fuel. And with only a few decibels in sound difference, crusie or at WOT, and even though the decible scale is exponential ... no one alive can discern any real noise difference. Personally, I LOVE the growl that Suzi 250 puts out.Not too sure if the few $'s saved by buying Susiki is worth the extra noise, poorer milage, and "discount motor" public perception...
Have you seen the cost of the Evinrude 250s? Man they don't give them away :shock: ! Their stock 250hp is a good $5K more than a Suzuki 250hp. I thought about the HO model with the racing-type lower unit, but it was another $2K more! Add to that the extra cost of the $50/gallon synthetic oil .. and forget it.Megabyte":1tfb1242 said:If I were re-powering my 2520 today, I would seriously consider both the Yamaha and the Etec 250's. It would be a difficult choice to make.
FishFactory":2vjg4yax said:IMO, Yamaha's overwhelming success has been on the back of relibility, quiet, economical.
Not too sure if the few $'s saved by buying Susiki is worth the extra noise, poorer milage, and "discount motor" public perception....IMO.
FishFactory":pxyks1b9 said:
B-Faithful":27hrrngt said:If merc would make the Optimax quieter, that would be my motor of choice! My optimax was a great motor with ZERO issues.
Enter your email address to join: